The CTSA Visiting Scholar Program was designed as a means to establish a set of meetings between “visiting” KL2 scholars and their peers at different hubs.
Host Hub - CTSA Visiting Scholar Program Survey
Domain
KL2
Group
CTSA Visiting Scholar Working Group
Distributed
January 1, 2021
Last Updated
January 1, 2021
Status
Completed Project with Published Results
Files
You must log in to view this page.
Log InPurpose
Executive Summary
The CTSA Visiting Scholar Program was designed as a means to establish a set of meetings between “visiting” KL2 scholars and their peers at different hubs. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, Phase 1 of this program consisted of 56 virtual meetings. After the conclusion of this round of visiting scholars, a unique REDCap survey link was sent to the KL2 directors and/or PIs of participating hubs. This was followed by two subsequent weekly reminders. At the conclusion of the online data collection, 25 responses were received from the total of 27 hubs, for a final response rate of 92.6%. The evaluation examines how well the program goals were achieved. This report of the evaluation addresses overall satisfaction, any facilitators and/or challenges to planning these visits, and any improvements that could be made to the program in the future. The majority of respondents “Agreed” or “Strongly Agreed” that hearing scholar talks was highly valuable to their own scholars/programs (n=21, 84.0%). Nearly all respondents also indicated it was “Likely” or “Extremely Likely” that their hub would participate in another round of the Visiting Scholars Program in the future (n=23, 92.0%). The survey included open-ended questions, for which attendees were asked to describe anything new they learned or the most helpful aspect of attending the Un Meeting. All comments are shown in the report.
Questions
Results: 21 Questions
1. Hearing Scholar formal presentations/talks during visits was valuable to our programs/scholars
2. The visits were valuable in terms of our institutional research
3. The visits were valuable in terms of the Scholars' career development
4. Operational logistics were easy to execute for the visits
5. The Visiting Scholars typically met at least 1 person they are likely to contact in the future
6. I would recommend hosting a scholar as part of the CTSA Visiting Scholar Program to other institutions
7. How difficult was it to plan visits?
8. Please explain your rating of how difficult it was to plan a visit.
9. How likely is it that your hub will participate in another round of visiting professorship again?
10. Please explain your rating of how likely your hub will be to participate in another round of visiting professorship.
11. In general, how engaged were your scholars in the program?
12. Please explain your rating of how engaged your scholars were in the program.
13. In general, how engaged were your faculty members in the program?
14. Please explain your rating of how engaged your faculty members were in the program.
15. Based on your hub's experiences, how valuable were these virtual visits for the scholars (both the visiting scholars and your own)?
16. Please explain your rating for how valuable these virtual visits were for both the visiting scholars and your own scholars.
17. Do you think this Virtual Visiting Scholar program is sustainable?
18. Please explain your rating for how sustainable this Virtual Visiting Scholar program is.
19. What were the things you found most useful regarding the CTSA Visiting Scholar Program?
20. What were the things that could be improved regarding the CTSA Visiting Scholar Program?
21. What is your role within the institution?
