To evaluate overall experience attending the Program Group Meetings and to indicate which individual meetings they had attended.
2022 Spring CTSA Program Group Meetings Evaluation Report
Domain
CTSA Program Meetings
Group
CLIC
Distributed
April 23, 2022
Last Updated
April 23, 2022
Status
Completed Project with Published Results
Files
You must log in to view this page.
Log InPurpose
Executive Summary
The 2022 Spring CTSA Program Group Meetings, which took place on April 22nd and 23rd, 2022 in person in Chicago, Illinois, and virtually via Zoom, included evaluations for the CTSA Program Hub Communicators, Collaboration and Engagement, Integration Across the Lifespan meetings, and the Joint Meeting of KL2 Directors, TL1 Directors and Workforce Development Enterprise Committee. A total of 314 individuals attended at least one of the Program Group Meetings. Participants who registered before attending the meeting were emailed an individualized unique survey link to complete the 2022 Spring Program Group Meetings Logistics evaluation. Two follow-up reminder emails were sent to individuals who had not responded. Of the 314 registered attendees, a total of 109 responses were received, for a response rate of 34.7%. Registered attendees were asked questions about their overall experience attending the Program Group Meetings and to indicate which individual meetings they had attended. Respondents were then directed to a survey queue to complete evaluations for each individual meeting they attended. Questions addressed meeting content, expectations, future steps, and satisfaction with the overall meeting. These responses will be used in planning subsequent meetings. The 2022 evaluation differs from previous versions because of the return to in-person format with a virtual option. A complete set of qualitative responses for the Spring CTSA Program Group Meetings is included in the appendix. In general, both quantitative and qualitative responses were very positive, and indicated that the meeting met or exceeded the attendees’ expectations. Overall, attendees were pleased with presentations and content. While comments were gathered, it is important to note that these came from a very small fraction of attendees. Areas for improvement, taken from these comments, included the meeting time and length of presentations, more discussion on a specific topic, and technical issues during specific sessions.
Questions
Results: 55 Questions
1. How did you attend the 2022 Spring CTSA Program Group Meetings?
2. What meetings did you attend? (Check all that apply)
3. Online Registration Process
4. CLIC Online Assistance
5. Virtual Platform Quality (meeting rooms, network connectivity, sound, etc.)
6. Attending the 2022 Spring CTSA Program Group Meetings overall via Zoom on your computer and/or tablet.
7. Attending the 2022 Spring CTSA Program Group Meetings overall.
8. Would you recommend using this virtual platform for future program meetings to your colleagues?
9. Why would you not recommend using this virtual platform for future program meetings to your colleagues?
10. Please provide an overall rating of the 2022 Spring CTSA Program Group Meetings. (1 = the lowest rating, 10 = the highest rating)
11. Please provide any feedback you may have about your overall experience at the 2022 Spring CTSA Program Group Meetings.
12. The Program Hub Communicators Meeting covered topics I found valuable.
13. The Program Hub Communicators Meeting addressed my expectations.
14. The Program Hub Communicators Meeting was a valuable addition to ongoing teleconferences.
15. I understand the next steps for the Program Hub Communicators group moving forward in 2022.
16. Please rate your level of satisfaction attending the 2022 Spring CTSA Program Hub Communicators Meeting via Zoom on your computer and/or tablet.
17. Please rate your level of satisfaction attending the 2022 Spring CTSA Program Hub Communicators Meeting.
18. Please provide an overall rating of the 2022 Spring CTSA Program Hub Communicators Meeting. (1 = the lowest rating, 10 = the highest rating)
19. What topics would you like to discuss at a future Program Hub Communicators Meeting?
20. What Program Hub Communicators Meeting content did you find most useful?
21. What Program Hub Communicators Meeting content did you find least useful?
22. Please provide any additional feedback on the Program Hub Communicators Meeting below.
23. The Joint Meeting of Workforce Development Enterprise Committee, KL2 PI Directors and TL1 PI Directors covered topics I found valuable.
24. The Joint Meeting of Workforce Development Enterprise Committee, KL2 PI Directors and TL1 PI Directors addressed my expectations.
25. The Joint Meeting of Workforce Development Enterprise Committee, KL2 PI Directors and TL1 PI Directors was a valuable addition to ongoing teleconferences.
26. I understand the next steps for the Joint Meeting of Workforce Development Enterprise Committee, KL2 PI Directors and TL1 PI Directors moving forward in 2022.
27. Please rate your level of satisfaction attending the Joint Meeting of Workforce Development Enterprise Committee, KL2 PI Directors and TL1 PI Directors via Zoom on your computer and/or tablet.
28. Please rate your level of satisfaction attending the Joint Meeting of Workforce Development Enterprise Committee, KL2 PI Directors and TL1 PI Directors.
29. Please provide an overall rating of the Joint Meeting of Workforce Development Enterprise Committee, KL2 PI Directors and TL1 PI Directors. (1 = the lowest rating, 10 = the highest rating)
30. What topics would you like to discuss at a future Joint Meeting of Workforce Development Enterprise Committee, KL2 PI Directors and TL1 PI Directors?
31. What Joint Meeting of Workforce Development Enterprise Committee, KL2 PI Directors and TL1 PI Directors content did you find most useful?
32. What Joint Meeting of Workforce Development Enterprise Committee, KL2 PI Directors and TL1 PI Directors content did you find least useful?
33. Please provide any additional feedback on the Joint Meeting of Workforce Development Enterprise Committee, KL2 PI Directors and TL1 PI Directors below.
34. The Integration Across the Lifespan Meeting covered topics I found valuable.
35. The Integration Across the Lifespan Meeting addressed my expectations.
36. The Integration Across the Lifespan Meeting was a valuable addition to ongoing teleconferences.
37. I understand the next steps for the Integration Across the Lifespan group moving forward in 2022.
38. Please rate your level of satisfaction attending the 2022 Spring Integration Across the Lifespan Meeting via Zoom on your computer and/or tablet.
39. Please rate your level of satisfaction attending the 2022 Spring Integration Across the Lifespan Meeting.
40. Please provide an overall rating of the 2022 Spring Integration Across the Lifespan Meeting. (1 = the lowest rating, 10 = the highest rating)
41. What topics would you like to discuss at a future Integration Across the Lifespan Meeting?
42. What Integration Across the Lifespan Meeting content did you find most useful?
43. What Integration Across the Lifespan Meeting content did you find least useful?
44. Please provide any additional feedback on the Integration Across the Lifespan Meeting below.
45. The Collaboration & Engagement Meeting covered topics I found valuable.
46. The Collaboration & Engagement Meeting addressed my expectations.
47. The Collaboration & Engagement Meeting was a valuable addition to ongoing teleconferences
48. I understand the next steps for the Collaboration & Engagement group moving forward in 2022.
49. Please rate your level of satisfaction attending the 2022 Spring Collaboration & Engagement Meeting via Zoom on your computer and/or tablet.
50. Please rate your level of satisfaction attending the 2022 Spring Collaboration & Engagement Meeting.
51. Please provide an overall rating of the 2022 Spring Collaboration & Engagement Meeting. (1 = the lowest rating, 10 = the highest rating)
52. What topics would you like to discuss at a future Collaboration & Engagement Meeting?
53. What Collaboration & Engagement Meeting content did you find most useful?
54. What Collaboration & Engagement Meeting content did you find least useful?
55. Please provide any additional feedback on the Collaboration & Engagement Meeting below.
