To gather feedback regarding the 2021 CTSA Spring Program Meetings
2021 Spring CTSA Program Meeting Evaluation
Domain
CTSA Program Meetings
Group
CLIC
Distributed
April 16, 2021
Last Updated
April 16, 2021
Status
Completed Project with Published Results
Files
You must log in to view this page.
Log InPurpose
Executive Summary
The 2021 Spring CTSA Program Group Meetings, which took place on April 14th and 15th, 2021 via GTR, included evaluations for the CTSA Program Hub Communicators, Common Metrics Initiative, Collaboration and Engagement, Informatics, and Integration Across the Lifespan meetings, as well as the Joint Meeting of KL2 Directors, TL1 Directors and Workforce Development Enterprise Committee. A total of 600 individuals attended at least one of the Program Group Meetings. Participants who registered before attending the meeting were emailed an individualized unique survey link to complete the 2021 Spring Program Group Meetings Logistics evaluation. Two follow-up reminder emails were sent to individuals who had not responded. Of the 600 registered attendees, a total of 199 responses were received, for a response rate of 33.2%. Registered attendees were asked questions about their overall experience attending the Program Group Meetings and to indicate which individual meetings they had attended. Respondents were then directed to a survey queue to complete evaluations for each individual meeting they attended. Questions addressed meeting content, expectations, future steps, and satisfaction with the virtual platform. These responses will be used in planning subsequent meetings. The 2021 evaluation differs from previous versions because of the change in overall virtual format. This updated version includes new or expanded questions to assess the experience of attending the Spring Meeting via the GTR platform. A complete set of qualitative responses for the Spring CTSA Program Group Meetings is included in the appendix. In general, both quantitative and qualitative responses were very positive, and indicated that the meeting met or exceeded the attendees’ expectations. Overall, attendees were pleased with presentations and content, and enjoyed the breakout sessions. While comments were gathered, it is important to note that these came from a very small fraction of attendees. Areas for improvement, taken from these comments, included the meeting time lengths, more discussion on a specific topic, ease of virtual platform use for users, and a more seamless registration process.
Questions
Results: 69 Questions
1. What meetings did you attend? (Check all that apply)
2. Online Registration Process
3. CLIC Online Assistance
4. Virtual Platform Quality (meeting rooms, network connectivity, sound, etc.)
5. Attending the 2021 Spring CTSA Program Meeting overall via Zoom on your computer and/or tablet.
6. Would you recommend using this virtual platform for future program meetings to your colleagues?
7. Why would you not recommend using this virtual platform for future program meetings to your colleagues?
8. Please provide an overall rating of the 2021 Spring CTSA Program Meeting.
9. Please provide any feedback you may have about your overall experience at the 2021 Spring CTSA Program Meeting.
10. The Program Hub Communicators Meeting covered topics I found valuable.
11. The Program Hub Communicators Meeting addressed my expectations.
12. The Program Hub Communicators Meeting was a valuable addition to ongoing teleconferences.
13. I understand the next steps for the Program Hub Communicators group moving forward in 2021.
14. Please rate your level of satisfaction attending the 2021 Spring CTSA Program Hub Communicators Meeting via Zoom on your computer and/or tablet.
15. Please provide an overall rating of the 2021 Spring CTSA Program Hub Communicators Meeting.
16. What topics would you like to discuss at a future Program Hub Communicators Meeting?
17. What Program Hub Communicators Meeting content did you find most useful?
18. What Program Hub Communicators Meeting content did you find least useful?
19. Please provide any additional feedback on the Program Hub Communicators Meeting below.
20. The Informatics EC Meeting covered topics I found valuable.
21. The Informatics EC Meeting addressed my expectations.
22. The Informatics EC Meeting was a valuable addition to ongoing teleconferences.
23. I understand the next steps for the Informatics group moving forward in 2021.
24. Please rate your level of satisfaction attending the 2021 Spring Informatics EC Meeting via Zoom on your computer and/or tablet.
25. Please provide an overall rating of the 2021 Spring Informatics EC Meeting.
26. What topics would you like to discuss at a future Informatics EC Meeting?
27. What Informatics EC Meeting content did you find most useful?
28. What Informatics EC content did you find least useful?
29. Please provide any additional feedback on the Informatics EC Meeting below.
30. The Integration Across the Lifespan Meeting covered topics I found valuable.
31. The Integration Across the Lifespan Meeting addressed my expectations.
32. The Integration Across the Lifespan Meeting was a valuable addition to ongoing teleconferences.
33. I understand the next steps for the Integration Across the Lifespan group moving forward in 2021.
34. Please rate your level of satisfaction attending the 2021 Spring Integration Across the Lifespan Meeting via Zoom on your computer and/or tablet.
35. Please provide an overall rating of the 2021 Spring Integration Across the Lifespan Meeting.
36. What topics would you like to discuss at a future Integration Across the Lifespan Meeting?
37. What Integration Across the Lifespan Meeting content did you find most useful?
38. What Integration Across the Lifespan Meeting content did you find least useful?
39. Please provide any additional feedback on the Integration Across the Lifespan Meeting below.
40. The Common Metrics Initiative Meeting covered topics I found valuable.
41. The Common Metrics Initiative Meeting addressed my expectations.
42. The Common Metrics Initiative Meeting was a valuable addition to ongoing teleconferences
43. I understand the next steps for the Common Metrics Initiative group moving forward in 2021.
44. Please rate your level of satisfaction attending the 2021 Spring Common Metrics Initiative Meeting via Zoom on your computer and/or tablet.
45. Please provide an overall rating of the 2021 Spring Common Metrics Initiative Meeting.
46. What topics would you like to discuss at a future Common Metrics Initiative Meeting?
47. What Common Metrics Initiative Meeting content did you find most useful?
48. What Common Metrics Initiative Meeting content did you find least useful?
49. Please provide any additional feedback on the Common Metrics Initiative Meeting below.
50. The Collaboration & Engagement Meeting covered topics I found valuable.
51. The Collaboration & Engagement Meeting addressed my expectations.
52. The Collaboration & Engagement Meeting was a valuable addition to ongoing teleconferences.
53. I understand the next steps for the Collaboration & Engagement group moving forward in 2021.
54. Please rate your level of satisfaction attending the 2021 Spring Collaboration & Engagement Meeting via Zoom on your computer and/or tablet.
55. Please provide an overall rating of the 2021 Spring Collaboration & Engagement Meeting.
56. What topics would you like to discuss at a future Collaboration & Engagement Meeting?
57. What Collaboration & Engagement Meeting content did you find most useful?
58. What Collaboration & Engagement Meeting content did you find least useful?
59. Please provide any additional feedback on the Collaboration & Engagement Meeting below.
60. The Joint Meeting of Workforce Development, TL1 PI Directors and KL2 PI Directors covered topics I found valuable.
61. The Joint Meeting of Workforce Development, TL1 PI Directors and KL2 PI Directors addressed my expectations.
62. The Joint Meeting of Workforce Development, TL1 PI Directors and KL2 PI Directors was a valuable addition to ongoing teleconferences.
63. I understand the next steps for the Joint Meeting of Workforce Development, TL1 PI Directors and KL2 PI Directors moving forward in 2021.
64. Please rate your level of satisfaction attending the Joint Meeting of Workforce Development, TL1 PI Directors and KL2 PI Directors via Zoom on your computer and/or tablet.
65. Please provide an overall rating of the Joint Meeting of Workforce Development, TL1 PI Directors and KL2 PI Directors.
66. What topics would you like to discuss at a future Meeting of Workforce Development, TL1 PI Directors and KL2 PI Directors?
67. What Joint Meeting of Workforce Development, TL1 PI Directors and KL2 PI Directors content did you find most useful?
68. What Joint Meeting of Workforce Development, TL1 PI Directors and KL2 PI Directors content did you find least useful?
69. Please provide any additional feedback on the Joint Meeting of Workforce Development, TL1 PI Directors and KL2 PI Directors below.
